|
Post by Henrik on Oct 5, 2018 8:26:11 GMT
I just stumbled across this excerpt from Panella's webpage. I found it rather interesting. Cayce is a rather heavy-weight name to "throw around". John claims no apparent links and ignorance in this question, which I believe. BUT, it is rather interesting to speculate that MAYBE Cayce was referring to Panella when he identified that "Peniel" would reveal the Father around the turn of the century. Similarily, without me knowing this other Peniel-character AT ALL, I speculate that this is the "fake character" inserted to create confusion and highjack Cayce's predictions.
This is all just a quickly put-together speculative post, feel free not to take this too seriously; just a fun-nugget. Here's Panella's excerpt:
|
|
|
Post by ML on Oct 6, 2018 15:47:01 GMT
I just stumbled across this excerpt from Panella's webpage. I found it rather interesting. Cayce is a rather heavy-weight name to "throw around". John claims no apparent links and ignorance in this question, which I believe. BUT, it is rather interesting to speculate that MAYBE Cayce was referring to Panella when he identified that "Peniel" would reveal the Father around the turn of the century. Similarily, without me knowing this other Peniel-character AT ALL, I speculate that this is the "fake character" inserted to create confusion and highjack Cayce's predictions.This is all just a quickly put-together speculative post, feel free not to take this too seriously; just a fun-nugget. Here's Panella's excerpt: That makes sense. i think that is the case. specially the other John teaches law of one. Law of one is absolutely true and requires but has been weaponized.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2018 21:44:51 GMT
Now actually David Wilcock will not deny claims he is the reincarnation of Cayce. David comes across as a insider with privileged information and is quite entertaining. The caution side is he is often in alliance with Cory Goode. Just more fun stuff
|
|
|
Post by Henrik on Oct 8, 2018 7:14:52 GMT
Now actually David Wilcock will not deny claims he is the reincarnation of Cayce. David comes across as a insider with privileged information and is quite entertaining. The caution side is he is often in alliance with Cory Goode. Just more fun stuff He does quite look like a young Cayce in certain pictures, I'll give him that, but he some ways to go if he wants to fill those shoes, lol
|
|
|
Post by girlscout on Nov 18, 2018 9:53:30 GMT
That makes sense. i think that is the case. specially the other John teaches law of one. Law of one is absolutely true and requires but has been weaponized. What do you mean by "weaponized"? I read the famous "Law Of One" and it seemed to me (intuition) a complete AIF document if I ever read one! David Wilcock swears by the Law of One and just that of me is telling. I do not give much credence to DW! There might be a "real Law of One" versus the AIF version, is that what you mean? Thank you so much. Can’t speak to Miron’s intent/meaning, however, I will share my thoughts on it, if you don’t mind. 1). I think/believe that DW (and Steven Greer) are sincere. Any misleading they do is because they have been misled. 2). I think/believe that attempting to move people from “me, me, me” to “how can I help” is a valiant effort. (Fruit producing, perhaps.). We just need to be careful of who we help. 3). I think/believe that the Barbara Marciniak material (the Pleiadeans) and the Ra material (Law of One) are both attempts to correct what they view as “unintended consequences “ of previous interactions. I do think there were beneficent alien efforts during the 80s... yes, I DO think there is such a thing - just not on earth anymore. 4). What struck me most about the Ra presentation of the Law of One is the emphasis on “not being elite”, as though the lesson about that had (finally) been learned. This gives me the idea that the learning of that was hard won, and so a redemptive effort was considered important enough to act on. These are my impressions, anyway. FWIW.
|
|
|
Post by girlscout on Nov 18, 2018 9:55:29 GMT
I just stumbled across this excerpt from Panella's webpage. I found it rather interesting. Cayce is a rather heavy-weight name to "throw around". John claims no apparent links and ignorance in this question, which I believe. BUT, it is rather interesting to speculate that MAYBE Cayce was referring to Panella when he identified that "Peniel" would reveal the Father around the turn of the century. Similarily, without me knowing this other Peniel-character AT ALL, I speculate that this is the "fake character" inserted to create confusion and highjack Cayce's predictions. This is all just a quickly put-together speculative post, feel free not to take this too seriously; just a fun-nugget. Here's Panella's excerpt: Has anyone read Peniel’s work yet?
|
|
|
Post by ML on Nov 19, 2018 1:52:23 GMT
That makes sense. i think that is the case. specially the other John teaches law of one. Law of one is absolutely true and requires but has been weaponized. What do you mean by "weaponized"? I read the famous "Law Of One" and it seemed to me (intuition) a complete AIF document if I ever read one! David Wilcock swears by the Law of One and just that of me is telling. I do not give much credence to DW! There might be a "real Law of One" versus the AIF version, is that what you mean? Thank you so much. What i mean was. The LAW OF ONE really makes sense... but it was used/being used by people to control others.... the same as CHRISTIANITY, ISLAM, etc.... individuals use it as a weapon in advancing their agenda. -- LAW OF ONE can simply be described as : 12 Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets. Matthew 7:12 King James Version (KJV) because all of us are/is just one Thanks
|
|
|
Post by girlscout on Aug 24, 2019 17:59:14 GMT
I am reviewing channeled material from L/L Research, who brought Law of One forward (again). Found this: “The way from this illusion—which is a tiny part of reality—to reality cannot be measured, and is as individual as your handprint. There is, however, a quality whereby the circumstances for understanding may occur. This quality is more possible to obtain in meditation, for by it the intellect, which is responsive only to the illusion about you, is stilled.” www.llresearch.org/transcripts/issues/1974/1974_0308.aspx
|
|