|
Post by Hans Schokkenbroek on Dec 10, 2018 7:21:14 GMT
I was recently confronted with the reality of vaccinations or I should say will be soon. Since my awakening I have not had to deal with vaccines as my only child Jasper with Down Syndrome is 15 years old, and I was happy about that because I know my wife is fully for vaccinations. As she is for Fluoride as a dentist... Apparently the Dutch government think Jasper falls into a risk category and therefor he will be called to take a flu vaccination shot sometime next year. Most of us probably are aware that we can control our own health (Biology of Belief) but family is a different matter. Although I tend to think we can chose any Universe / timeline that has the (outside) circumstances that you want. So in theory I can chose the Universe that has a healthy Jasper. Anyway, I just thought it would be good to have a separate thread for health as it affects all of our families. I like this quote by Gandhi, it also applies well to Fluoride which is a toxin....
|
|
|
Post by Hans Schokkenbroek on Dec 10, 2018 7:28:55 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ray on Aug 8, 2019 1:25:34 GMT
To gain the best perspective it is being in the emergency section of the hospital as I was, and given the choice DIE for sure without a vaccine or SURVIVE because of a vaccine. I had the intelligence to chose to LIVE.
|
|
|
Post by ML on Aug 8, 2019 5:29:10 GMT
To gain the best perspective it is being in the emergency section of the hospital as I was, and given the choice DIE for sure without a vaccine or SURVIVE because of a vaccine. I had the intelligence to chose to LIVE. what happened? Kindly share pls. Thanks
|
|
|
Vaccines
Aug 8, 2019 18:37:58 GMT
via mobile
Post by Hans Schokkenbroek on Aug 8, 2019 18:37:58 GMT
So you opted for the vaccine based on the doctors advise that you would die orherwise. We will never know what would have happened if you would not have taken the vaccine. So I respect that you think the vaccine saved your life but I fail to see the proof of that. Interesting conversation Ray and I thank you for that.
|
|
|
Post by ray on Aug 9, 2019 2:14:07 GMT
Sure we know. If I had NOT received the vaccine or booster, I would have got tetanus which requires emergency treatment, major drug therapy with side effects, muscle spasms, breathing problems requiring a ventilator etc.
Bottom line is that if tetanus does NOT kill you then there is a strong likelihood that the treatment will.(without taking the vaccine)
|
|
|
Post by ML on Aug 9, 2019 2:52:14 GMT
Sure we know. If I had NOT received the vaccine or booster, I would have got tetanus which requires emergency treatment, major drug therapy with side effects, muscle spasms, breathing problems requiring a ventilator etc.
Bottom line is that if tetanus does NOT kill you then there is a strong likelihood that the treatment will.(without taking the vaccine) did you already have tetanus? or the bacteria that cause it? --- Funny story. a year ago when our house was under construction. I step on an extremely rusty nail. The wound was at least 1 Inch deep and at least 5 table spoon of blood has flowed out of my heel. It hurts. but i see it as an opportunity to experiment on myself. at that time i was feeling well and had no cough, colds or any physical discomfort. If i go to the doctor, a great deal of time will be spent and also a great deal of discomfort with the syringe shots and of course it will cost money. I said to myself "My Immune system can handle this". I just clean the wound with soap and Hydrogen peroxide. I kept my self cool and confident. -- I was a success. My mind came through
|
|
|
Post by Hans Schokkenbroek on Aug 9, 2019 6:18:30 GMT
Sure we know. If I had NOT received the vaccine or booster, I would have got tetanus which requires emergency treatment, major drug therapy with side effects, muscle spasms, breathing problems requiring a ventilator etc.
Bottom line is that if tetanus does NOT kill you then there is a strong likelihood that the treatment will.(without taking the vaccine) I can never speak for someone else Ray. It seems clear you believe this and that is fine. It is based on rational thinking and the reasoning is based on your belief systems. You have have been taught that tetanus is inevitable in such situations by medical science. It is impossible to reconcile rational thinking with spiritual knowing. One is the mind, the programmed biocomputer in operation, and the other is the Heart, the inner feeling and knowing. The mind is largely rooted in the programming due to one's exposure to the environment in which we live and grow up. If a child or person is taught we cannot heal ourselves then that becomes his or hers truth. Feelings on the other hand can never be rationalised. They can only be personally experienced. My feeling and personal experience says I can heal any situation in my body (again I can only speak about myself) by bringing the energy in my non-physical body in balance. That is in fact what I do when I help other people to heal. I respect fully if you feel otherwise. I find this a really interesting topic!
|
|
|
Post by ray on Aug 14, 2019 0:18:45 GMT
May be an interesting topic but when my answer/posts DISAPPEAR after I read them, the communication becomes rather ONE WAY.
|
|
|
Post by ML on Aug 14, 2019 1:34:25 GMT
May be an interesting topic but when my answer/posts DISAPPEAR after I read them, the communication becomes rather ONE WAY. how did it dis appear? maybe its your connection or something caan you post it again pls? i really like to see your view on this. Thanks
|
|
|
Post by ML on Aug 14, 2019 1:35:20 GMT
or maybe post it in shoutbox. lol
|
|
|
Post by IW on Aug 14, 2019 4:54:56 GMT
I'm wondering if it's similar to what happens with me, you write a long response or maybe take your time with a response and as soon as you click the post reply the whole thing disappears? I have handled that problem by copying the whole response. Then I can paste it back if it does go away.
Otherwise, I'm 110% sure no one is messing with your posts Ray. But feel free to use the shoutbox, only- if it's a long response then it will scroll fairly quickly away..
|
|
|
Post by Hans Schokkenbroek on Aug 14, 2019 5:49:06 GMT
May be an interesting topic but when my answer/posts DISAPPEAR after I read them, the communication becomes rather ONE WAY. The only times posts have disappeared is when I used Quick Reply instead of Reply. With the former you are supposed to click the button "post quick reply" after you have written your post. It has happened to me several times where I thought I had posted it but I had not. Initially thinking that someone or something was trying to prevent me from posting but in all cases it was simply my operator error...
|
|
|
Post by ray on Aug 14, 2019 19:09:29 GMT
To answer one of your earlier questions, Miron. I was working on replacing an old deck and stepped right down to the deck onto a 3 inch rusty nail that was facing upward. My shoe filled with blood. Why the doctor said what she did, was that 20% of those with tetanus die of suffocation and that is without other complications. I did not have a previous tetanus shot, nor booster when I was very young. I have alergies and the possibility of an allergic reation. I have breathing problems related to second hand smoke and I had 6 months of chemo. All that makes me a high percentage candidate for death by tetanus, without the vaccine.
|
|
|
Post by ML on Aug 15, 2019 0:34:14 GMT
To answer one of your earlier questions, Miron. I was working on replacing an old deck and stepped right down to the deck onto a 3 inch rusty nail that was facing upward. My shoe filled with blood. Why the doctor said what she did, was that 20% of those with tetanus die of suffocation and that is without other complications. I did not have a previous tetanus shot, nor booster when I was very young. I have alergies and the possibility of an allergic reation. I have breathing problems related to second hand smoke and I had 6 months of chemo. All that makes me a high percentage candidate for death by tetanus, without the vaccine. That is a choice you make and it works for you. Just recently got extreme allergies and the inhaler gave me comfort. My ultimate solution is to be away from allergens that triggers the asthma. and that is to live in the country side near the beach. as of now Inhaler will do.
|
|
|
Post by ray on Aug 15, 2019 1:26:01 GMT
Less of a choice and more of an intelligent decision based on the information available from the doctor as well as personal research.
|
|
|
Post by ML on Aug 15, 2019 2:39:08 GMT
Less of a choice and more of an intelligent decision based on the information available from the doctor as well as personal research. An intelligent decision it is Thanks Ray!
|
|
|
Post by ray on Aug 15, 2019 15:21:32 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 26, 2020 13:13:58 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Stranger2 on Apr 26, 2020 13:58:24 GMT
The Truth About Judy MikovitsWhen researching any subject, it is wise to always look from different perspectives and listen to all opinions, facts and arguments from various sources. We live in a complex world and in most cases the problems and solutions are not as simple as they seem to be (or at least not as simple as we want them to be). To the subject of this thread: almost every vaccine, medicine or artificially made substance has harmful side effects on our bodies, and every doctor knows that. On the other hand most of them still work well to prevent the harm from the health problems (deceases) that they are designed to address. The question is about the choice between the harm of the side effects of using the vaccine/medicine, and the harm of not using it. In most cases the harm of not using and suffering from a decease is much greater than the harm from the side effects, so we accept the harm of side effects in order to avoid the bigger harm of the decease being addressed. But there are also cases where the opposite is true. In any case, it is wise to always know all possible side effects and to make informed choices. And it is not wise to become a black-or-white orthodox supporter or denier of any vaccine or medicine or any other things in life. In our complex world things and people are very rarely entirely good or entirely bad, they are usually a mix of both, and we should deal with that wisely. But it is understandable that for most people it is easier to oversimplify the world in which we live and choose black-and-white ways to understand it ignoring all the complexities of the gray areas. We have limited intellectual abilities and can not deal with all of the complexities of the world. We tend to choose simple models, but there is a side effect of that: simpler models are easier to understand and use, but they are usually less accurate, most often they are grossly inaccurate. And their inaccuracy leads to wrong predictions and to making bad choices. So here we have a similar choice and need to make a compromise between the complexity and the accuracy of our models/understanding of the world. The matrix of this world is extremely complex, it's the way it is designed. If we chose to live in it, we have to deal with its complexity. But there still another choice: dump this entire world-matrix and quit the game. Then we do not need to understand it and deal with it, its complexity and problems become irrelevant.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 26, 2020 18:42:51 GMT
The Truth About Judy MikovitsWhen researching any subject, it is wise to always look from different perspectives and listen to all opinions, facts and arguments from various sources. We live in a complex world and in most cases the problems and solutions are not as simple as they seem to be (or at least not as simple as we want them to be). To the subject of this thread: almost every vaccine, medicine or artificially made substance has harmful side effects on our bodies, and every doctor knows that. On the other hand most of them still work well to prevent the harm from the health problems (deceases) that they are designed to address. The question is about the choice between the harm of the side effects of using the vaccine/medicine, and the harm of not using it. In most cases the harm of not using and suffering from a decease is much greater than the harm from the side effects, so we accept the harm of side effects in order to avoid the bigger harm of the decease being addressed. But there are also cases where the opposite is true. In any case, it is wise to always know all possible side effects and to make informed choices. And it is not wise to become a black-or-white orthodox supporter or denier of any vaccine or medicine or any other things in life. In our complex world things and people are very rarely entirely good or entirely bad, they are usually a mix of both, and we should deal with that wisely. But it is understandable that for most people it is easier to oversimplify the world in which we live and choose black-and-white ways to understand it ignoring all the complexities of the gray areas. We have limited intellectual abilities and can not deal with all of the complexities of the world. We tend to choose simple models, but there is a side effect of that: simpler models are easier to understand and use, but they are usually less accurate, most often they are grossly inaccurate. And their inaccuracy leads to wrong predictions and to making bad choices. So here we have a similar choice and need to make a compromise between the complexity and the accuracy of our models/understanding of the world. The matrix of this world is extremely complex, it's the way it is designed. If we chose to live in it, we have to deal with its complexity. But there still another choice: dump this entire world-matrix and quit the game. Then we do not need to understand it and deal with it, its complexity and problems become irrelevant. Yep, we need to look at different perspectives in order to be able to form a well-informed conclusion. Now as for the Snopes article you posted, the question still remains: Where is the article with the original findings of Mikovits of 2009 about her discoveries with regard to XMRV? Why was the article retracted? Did it maybe contain information the world was not supposed to see? They could have kept the article for later discovery and comparison, no? So it is easy for Snopes to completely make fun of a scientist that has been fired and arrested, without any original findings that could even help us in making a valid research. All we have now is based on findings after the retraction. I went through the Nature.com article that Snopes referred to and there are some elements that look suspicious to me. "Mikovits counters that the experiments would have been beyond the scope of the federal grants that funded the work. Whittemore could not be reached for comment on the matter." "Mikovits says that the Science paper didn't mention the azacytidine treatment because that detail was not necessary for the publication. Instead, the authors referred to the samples as being 'activated'. But for her presentation, she wanted to emphasize that the addition of methyl groups to viral nucleic acids may have prevented the virus from being detected using standard assays. Azacytidine strips off those methyl groups and, Mikovits argues, can boost viral gene expression." It seems to me that quite some crucial elements are lacking here and it makes me wonder why no one ever talked about that ... As for the lawsuit, "the judge removed himself from the case because he received campaign donations from Harvey Whittemore, who himself has been criminally charged with making illegal campaign contributions to a federal official." Sounds like bribery to me. Why would Whittemore feel the need to do that if their case is so crystal clear? This world is just as complex as you think it is. It is a world filled with illusion, a world of description and deception, based on the narrative of someone else. People love to identify with labels and descriptions (I am a Republican, I am a Christian, I am this, I am that). The problem is that by putting that label on themselves, that they become the label. They need a label to define what and who they are. They become a label description of an idea/narrative that has been created by someone else. People are not satisfied anymore to simply be a human being, so they look for either ideologies or they want to escape this matrix. People have never known what it is to be human without that label, so they just follow others as a herd animal. So yes, as you say, stop playing the game. But not by escaping this matrix, which to me is just another ideology, that makes one believe that somewhere somehow it will be better. This planet is ours and we have all been playing the game designed by others for thousands of years. We have so long been following ideologies and doctrines designed by others, instead of taking personal responsibility and grow our own consciousness. There is no escaping the 1st cognition matrix by making another choice within that same matrix. I think what you are proposing here is very black and white thinking by just limiting ourselves to either that or the other choice. What if we wouldn't play the game anymore and create a completely new option? What if we don't use their menu anymore and create our own menu of choices?
|
|
|
Post by Stranger2 on Apr 26, 2020 20:05:58 GMT
So yes, as you say, stop playing the game. But not by escaping this matrix, which to me is just another ideology, that makes one believe that somewhere somehow it will be better. This planet is ours and we have all been playing the game designed by others for thousands of years. We have so long been following ideologies and doctrines designed by others, instead of taking personal responsibility and grow our own consciousness. There is no escaping the 1st cognition matrix by making another choice within that same matrix. I think what you are proposing here is very black and white thinking by just limiting ourselves to either that or the other choice. What if we wouldn't play the game anymore and create a completely new option? What if we don't use their menu anymore and create our own menu of choices? Well, what if there is no choice to play our game once we are on Earth, simply because the Earth and its realm itself is all part of the Matrix designed by "others". It's not that they designed their game to be played on Earth, but they designed the entire material universe realm as part of the game. And so, once you are on Earth you have no choice, you are forced to become part of the system because your human mind is designed with intrinsically distorted perception of reality and deeply rooted sense of separate self/ego. I already wrote about that before. Very few people over the human history were able to pass beyond the first cognition and only with a very limited success, and most of those who claim they did actually haven't even tried (unfortunately I met too many of those in the past). It's actually easy to explain. Any type of organic life form in the "material" universe has to develop and evolve within the framework of natural selection, the process of the struggle for survival. As Donald Hoffman proved in his studies, the natural selection only reinforces fitness and survival with inevitable development of egoic mind and distorted dualistic perception of reality. There is simply no way an organic life in a material universe can naturally develop into an ego-less and non-dualistic consciousness, it's simply against the rules of the material world because any non-egoic conscious forms of material life would not have even a slightest chance to survive in the natural selection. It is easy to say that we need to transcend our consciousness to the 2-nd cognition, but those who actually tried know for a fact how hard it is and how much of the 1st cognition cognitive patterns are deeply hardwired into the human mind. This is simply because those survival mechanisms and distorted perception of reality are hard-coded in our brains on the very deep levels down to the spinal cord where our basic instincts, egoic patterns and the perception of reality are formed. Because of that there is simply no way for our higher levels of consciousness (that "want" to ascend to the 2-nd cognition) to access, influence or change those animal-level spinal-cord layers of human mind. This understanding is entirely missing in the teachings of the majority of the modern teachers of enlightenment and non-duality, including Endall Bell, who mostly touch the topic of the 2-nd cognition on the ideological and intellectual level. But it is very well known and embraced in the Buddhist tradition with it's realistic, practical and sober approach to the realities of human condition. So it's like entering a VR game and trying to play against the rules. The game simply will not let you to create our own menu of choices, but in order to find out whether it will or will not let you, you need to actually try, not just say. So, if it turns out that it does not let you, then you either have to play according to the rules, or, if you don't like the game for some reason, your only option is to quit and start playing another game with the rules that work for you. And the latter would be much easier anyway than continue to try to play the game against the rules, because playing against the rules, even if it could be done, requires extraordinary efforts, which is very non-productive waste of time and energy. I'm not talking about doctrines or ideologies, those are just mind-games and scratching the surface. I'm talking about an actual realization of the 2-nd cognition, transformation of the entire consciousness into an ego-less state with non-dualistic perception of reality.
|
|
|
Post by Stranger2 on Apr 26, 2020 20:43:51 GMT
Something I would like to add, although I was reluctant to say that, but I want to be honest. Of course it is my opinion only, based on what I said above.
So, this "game designed by others" is actually the whole Matrix of this particular material universe, where Earth and its organic life forms is only a part of the Matrix. Any ideology that tries to convince us that we can live happy lives on Earth or in any other place in the dualistic multiverse according to our rules is only a part of the Matrix propaganda to convince us to stay in the Matrix. Basically, their paradigm is that this Matrix is not perfect, but it's an evolution game, it allows the participants to evolve, to grow, to learn, to explore, to develop themselves and contribute to the development of cultures and civilizations etc. And no doubt, a lot of souls subscribe to this agenda. I'm not saying that there is something entirely wrong with it, it has it's points. And the game certainly has potential to develop and improve.
However, there are certain very fundamental rules and limitations to this game that can not be broken, otherwise the whole game would fall apart. These fundamentals include the dualistic perception of reality, illusion of separate existence and of the sense of separate self. This dualistic world started from the "I am" thought-form and is entirely based on this fundamental cognition. There is simply no room to play in this game without these fundamentals ruling the consciousness. The very creators of the game have their cognition based on these fundamentals, so there is no surprise that the game that they designed is also based on these rules. This is simply because no conscious being on the level of 2nd cognition would ever even think of creating a brutal 1st cognition game with its insane amount of suffering, lies and confusion.
In other words, if you are fine with these fundamental rules, then yes, you can continue to play and develop the game, there is some room for growth and improvement to certain limits. If you are not, then the only choice is to quit. You are not allowed to break those rules and stay in the game, and you would not want to anyway. But, for the sake of clarity, again, any arguments for us to stay in the game are designed to keep us engaged in the game, the agenda here is pretty obvious.
Now, quitting this dualistic multiverse does not mean quitting any active life or game playing at all. There is a huge multiverse of non-dualistic worlds and games where there is no place for distorted dualistic perception or for any sense of separate existence. The boundary between these multiverses is not in space or time or energy levels, fundamentally it's in the cognition, in the state of consciousness. Souls of the 2nd cognition simply do not play 1st cognition games, there is nothing there appealing for them. But there are cases when they may partially enter the 1st cognition games or communicate to their inhabitants, but only to help those who are seeking liberation from the 1st cognition.
|
|
|
Post by Stranger2 on Apr 26, 2020 21:26:28 GMT
Now as for the Snopes article you posted, the question still remains: Where is the article with the original findings of Mikovits of 2009 about her discoveries with regard to XMRV? Why was the article retracted? Did it maybe contain information the world was not supposed to see? They could have kept the article for later discovery and comparison, no? So it is easy for Snopes to completely make fun of a scientist that has been fired and arrested, without any original findings that could even help us in making a valid research. All we have now is based on findings after the retraction. I went through the Nature.com article that Snopes referred to and there are some elements that look suspicious to me. You can read the original article here
|
|
|
Post by duckie on Apr 27, 2020 23:43:15 GMT
I went in to work today (I'm still considered an "essential" worker...) and found myself the sole employee not wearing a face mask. In California, everyone is required to wear a mask when s/he is outside the house. If you're standing in line waiting to get into the grocery store, if you're taking a stroll on the sidewalk, if you're doing anything (unless it's "exercise") you are required to wear a mask or a face covering. I found it ironic that the CDC recommends wearing N95 masks (when the "N" stands for Not Resistant to Virus) and they don't say anything about that. On their website which they direct people to check out (this is broadcast day and night on regular TV), they even show you how to make your own face mask using an ordinary T-shirt. Being an engineer -- never mind -- being a normal, thinking person -- I wrote about this on fakebook and was amazed at the number of people pushing back. Well, I guess I wasn't that amazed -- it proves social programming does work. I was surprised that nobody even bothered to read the label on the package of the masks. No small surprise either when I found out that Gavin Newsom, California's governor, just paid $1 billion dollars to the Chinese to make more masks. At about 5 cents a piece, that comes out to just over 500 masks per person in the State of California. As of today, our lock-down has been extended to the end of May.
Anyway, I was at work, and I looked out the window from my 8th floor work space that I share with probably another 10 or so people (it's a big work space, so we are all able to maintain at least 6 feet.) Outside below, there is a man-made pond that used to be full of of water -- it's a really nice spot to go out and have lunch and enjoy the sunshine. But since nobody is around anymore, they drained the pond. It was a sad sight. What made me even sadder was to see a mother duck with 6 little ducklings walking through the empty pond. Since they are still ducklings they can't fly yet, so they can't get to a larger body of water elsewhere to be safe.
Hold on a second, I'm getting to the vaccine part of this thread. I am not opposed to vaccines on an ideological basis. If there is a need (like Ray's tetanus shot), I can see the logic behind it. Take the vaccine to save a life. What I am opposed to is mandatory vaccination, whether it is required or not. Take the flu vaccine, for example. Every year that I had taken the shot, I had gotten the flu. The punchline is "you don't get a flu shot, you get shot with the flu." About 8 or 9 years ago, I stop getting all vaccines (the last one being a tetanus booster), and I have not gotten sick ONCE. I know this is just anecdotal evidence -- but it is my personal experience. To add to that, I would also like to point out that for the past 15 years (at least), they have not gotten the various strains/permutations of influenza correct. To put it bluntly, flu shots do not work.
Those of us in this forum (and elsewhere, of course) still have a choice (at least for the moment) to get vaccinated or not. But in most major cities in the US, a child cannot go to school unless they receive some 27 shots before age 18. A parent (usually both parents work) will have to have their children vaccinated if they want them in school. Besides the inherent danger of thimerosal, aluminum salts, aborted fetal cells or dead animal tissues, and "deactivated" viruses (and there's more), they are now or will be soon, using quantum dots -- a nanotech that is part of ID2020 rollout. This is no longer conspiracy; it's our reality. It's the beginning of the social credit system -- if you don't have one, you will not be able to rent a house, pay for gas or buy food. This, at least to me, is the main reason that Bill Gates is pushing for worldwide mandatory vaccination -- or "we will never be free of the virus". The older generation can probably say "no", but what about the children?
I am reminded of the ducks I saw this morning. Without that pond of water, the ducklings will face insurmountable odds of survival. Our collective humanity is like those little ducklings to me. I don't know if we're going to make it.
|
|
|
Post by angel on May 10, 2020 8:34:34 GMT
I do strongly disagrees with vaccine, I mean, I have already lost my country Canada, but not the unseen war by not agreeing to this.
|
|
|
Post by wornout on Jun 30, 2020 17:17:40 GMT
I just watch this video today and it really hit home since my health issues started way back to the 1976 swine flu vaccine.
H1N1 HOLOCAUST - POPULATION DECREASE
|
|
|
Post by ML on Jul 22, 2020 8:20:24 GMT
Relating to Jeff's posting above I found this article. I do not doubt your health problems started or at least greatly increased due to vaccination/flu shots.
This article had so many popups that the best I could do is copy and paste. (www.21cir.com) -----------
The 21st Century
Pentagon Study: Flu Shot Raises Risk of Coronavirus by 36% Children's Health Defense on 2020-04-22 (and Other Supporting Studies)!
On March 12th, 2020, Anderson Cooper and Dr. Sanjay Gupta held a global town hall on “Corona Facts and Fears.” During the discussion, Anderson said to the viewing audience, “And, again, if you are concerned about coronavirus, and you haven’t gotten a flu shot…you should get a flu shot.”
Setting safety and efficacy of influenza vaccination aside, is Anderson’s claim that the flu shot will help people fight COVID-19 remotely true? The short answer is no.
In fact, the results of many peer-reviewed, published studies prove that Anderson’s recommendation may have been the worst advice he could have given the public.
In searching the literature, the only study we have been able to find assessing flu shots and coronavirus is a 2020 US Pentagon study that found that the flu shot INCREASES the risks from coronavirus by 36%.
“Receiving influenza vaccination may increase the risk of other respiratory viruses, a phenomenon known as “virus interference…’vaccine derived’ virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus…” Here are the findings:
2020 Pentagon study: Flu vaccines increase risk of coronavirus by 36%
Examining non-influenza viruses specifically, the odds of coronavirus in vaccinated individuals were significantly higher when compared to unvaccinated individuals with an odds ratio (association between an exposure and an outcome) of 1.36. In other words, the vaccinated were 36% more likely to get coronavirus.
Many other studies suggest the increased risk of viral respiratory infections from the flu shot:
2018 CDC Study: Flu shots increase risk of non-flu acute respiratory illnesses (ARI) in children.
This CDC supported study concluded an increased risk of acute respiratory illness (ARI) among children <18 years caused by non-influenza respiratory pathogens post-influenza vaccination compared to unvaccinated children during the same period.
2011 Australian Study: Flu shot doubled risk of non-influenza viral infections and increased flu risk by 73%.
A prospective case-control study in healthy young Australian children found that seasonal flu shots doubled their risk of illness from non-influenza virus infections. Overall, the vaccine increased the risk of virus-associated acute respiratory illness, including influenza, by 73%.
2012 Hong Kong Study: Flu shots increased the risk of non-flu respiratory infections 4.4 times and tripled flu infections.
A randomized placebo-controlled trial in Hong Kong children found that flu shots increased the risk of non-influenza viral ARIs fivefold (OR 4.91,CI 1.04—8.14) and, including influenza, tripled the overall viral ARI risk (OR 3.17, CI 1.04—9.83).
2017 Study: Vaccinated children are 5.9 more likely to suffer pneumonia and 30.1 times more likely to have been diagnosed with Allergic Rhinitis than unvaccinated children.
Vaccinated children were 30.1 times more likely to have been diagnosed with Allergic Rhinitis and 5.9 times more likely to have been diagnosed with pneumonia than unvaccinated children.
2014 Study: Influenza-vaccinated children were 1.6 times more likely than unvaccinated children to have a non-influenza “Influenza-like-illness” (ILI).
Even more published science
The well-respected Cochrane Collaboration’s comprehensive 2010 meta-analysis of published influenza vaccine studies found that the influenza vaccination has “no effect” on hospitalization, and that there is “no evidence that vaccines prevent viral transmission or complications.
” The Cochrane Researchers concluded that the scientific evidence “seem to discourage the utilization of vaccination against influenza in healthy adults as a routine public health measure.”
In their meta-analysis, the Cochrane researchers accused the CDC of deliberately misrepresenting the science in order to support their universal influenza vaccination recommendation. Nevertheless, CNN and other mainstream media outlets continually broadcast CDC pronouncements as gospel and, ironically, ridicules those of us who actually read the science as “purveyors of ‘vaccine misinformation”.
By Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Chairman, Children’s Health Defense
Published by Children’s Health Defense
Pentagon Study: Flu Shot Raises Risk of Coronavirus by 36% (and Other Supporting Studies)
The 21st Century
The views expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of 21cir.
|
|
|
Post by ConcernedSovereign on Dec 24, 2020 19:21:27 GMT
More about the dangers of the vaccine for covid
INSTANTLY BANNED FROM YOUTUBE: Gain-Of-Function HIV-1 Retrovirus Admitted In Mainstream Narrative
|
|
|
Post by OneWhoIsAwake on Jan 2, 2021 3:48:23 GMT
Nurse Gets Bell’s Palsy After Taking “Vaccine” (Paralyzed Face) - Nashville,TN
|
|