Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2019 4:05:38 GMT
NEW YORK, Nov 18 (Reuters) - A woman who accuses Jeffrey Epstein of sexually abusing her as a child on Monday said Britain’s Prince Andrew should tell U.S. authorities what he knows about the financier.
"Prince Andrew, and any others who were close to Epstein, should come forward and give a statement under oath on what information they have," the woman, calling herself Jane Doe 15, said at a news conference with her lawyer Gloria Allred.
The woman on Monday became the latest of more than a dozen women to sue Epstein's estate, saying in her lawsuit that he subjected her to a "vicious, prolonged sexual assault" at his New Mexico ranch when she was 15.
In an interview on Saturday, Prince Andrew denied having sex with Virginia Giuffre, another of Epstein's alleged victims, who said in a previously filed lawsuit that she was trafficked by Epstein and forced to have sex with Prince Andrew when she was 17.
|
|
|
Post by ML on Nov 19, 2019 5:50:57 GMT
I cannot pin it in smooth details but i feel that these Royals are technically above the law our system is implementing.
I am betting 1 day of my earnings that not a single case will be filed against any royal.
because they are positioned above the courts.
just notice that they do not have surnames and continues to use medieval standards in name reference. Queen Elisabeth, Prince Andrew, Prince Charles.
unlike Steve Johnson from Canada, Stefano Edbergtovics from Ukraine or Hermogenes Batumbakal from the Philippines.
names are esoterically and extremely important
Genesis 2:20 King James Version (KJV)
20 And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him.
|
|
|
Post by Hans Schokkenbroek on Nov 19, 2019 7:28:40 GMT
I cannot pin it in smooth details but i feel that these Royals are technically above the law our system is implementing. I am betting 1 day of my earnings that not a single case will be filed against any royal. because they are positioned above the courts. just notice that they do not have surnames and continues to use medieval standards in name reference. Queen Elisabeth, Prince Andrew, Prince Charles. unlike Steve Johnson from Canada, Stefano Edbergtovics from Ukraine or Hermogenes Batumbakal from the Philippines. names are esoterically and extremely important Genesis 2:20 King James Version (KJV) 20 And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him. Great insight about the names Miron. It just totally confirms the Justinian Deception for me. The Royals are working directly for the Vatican, collecting the money from our trusts. They are indeed above the Maritime law.
|
|
|
Post by Henrik on Nov 19, 2019 12:59:58 GMT
As you say, they apply the law when it beneficial for them to do so. Most of the times they must pretend to follow the law to get us to follow the law, but as these guys are royal, they can stretch it, because we love our "important people" or the thought of it itself. Probably this whole thing is orchestrated and they faked his death, as they do so many. No way they put the prince in an interview on BBC and had them send that farce out for everybody to see unless they wanted it to be seen. Epstein is a smaller "face" of the "family", the royals are the biggest "faces" of the "family", but they are all just one big "happy family" interbreeding and putting all their children and cousins to work playing all sorts of parts, un-wittingly or not. We never see the actual "heads of the family", all we see are the talking-heads or they are hiding behind less "important" faces and titles.
|
|