SO WHATS THIS ABOUT A REALM THAT LAWYER LIKE TO IGNORE. Nov 12, 2019 13:40:45 GMT
Post by ML on Nov 12, 2019 13:40:45 GMT
SO WHATS THIS ABOUT A REALM THAT LAWYER LIKE TO IGNORE.
To really comprehend the claim that your ANZAC laid down and self determined is to look at that Bible and look at why it is tied to the Parliament and Judicial Systems in the first place.
Banks have had a run of your country since 1907, and earlier 1863 if you were to look at the British Empire. The Seat of Government was closed in 1973 and a foreign entity took its place imitating the de jure.
For any office at the moment to claim to be Australian is to be IMITATING A COMMONWEALTH PUBLIC OFFICIAL due to the fact that they are outside of the LINEAGE that is in your Constitution that shows and defines the Kingdom at which the Constitution finds its Jurisdiction.
Any Lawyer, barrister, solicitor, who attempts to play defence of law and ignores the realm, and then argues defence of the realm through law doesnt see the realm.
If you cannot define the realm, how are you to defend it.
If you cannot use the tools left by forefathers, including that bible to define the specifics of the realm and its creation, which then gives a line of authority and rule of law, then how can you defend a realm, or even then the law.
Parliament, and Judiciary are founded on the shoulders of that creation, they are PART OF THE CREATION, and what is created is always subordinate to the creator. Parliament is a creation of Men. Men exist in a Garden because they are in the Image of their God.
Lawyers and Politicians do not want you to know your spirit at this level as you have become SUBORDINATE TO MEN, and they want to keep that control over men. God forbid you to follow the laws of men and told you to listen to the words of God.
At some point you are going to have to realise that the very country at whidch was self determined at the Treaty of Versaille was founded under the blessing of Almighty God, and at a Judicial Level under High Court Rules 5(a) includes the Laws of England.
The Laws of England of the Bible, this is easily demonstrated if you read a King James Bible introduction to Prince James wherein it demonstrates this. You can add the Act of Settlement and the Bill of Rights to this list.
You are going to have to realise that the Bible is a rule book to set a foundation for a country, to be a garden at which MAN IS PUT in the image of their fathers, in the case of this country it would be ANZAC that spilt that blood.
That foundation set a garden in play before the constitution, and this is demonstrated by the lack of a defined border in the constitution. The states lose colonial boundaries and have NO BORDERS. Yet no national or federal border is defined until the Treaty of Versailles. The Bible shows you how to define this border, and how to defend that claim.
That creation, is a foundation you find in the Kings Domain.
In short, for any lawyer, no matter how high up the education chain they believe they are, if they cannot define in biblical and technical terms the garden, and its borders, and its foundation to be able to define that OUTSIDE OF ANYONE ELSE.
They have NO RIGHT to argue the realm, or treason, or traitor to it. Not being able to define it demonstrates the lack of credibility to defend it or attack it at law.
A constitutional lawyer who thinks the bible isnt important is already demonstrating their lack of constitutional awareness.