|
Post by mironlang on Apr 15, 2020 15:01:01 GMT
cysttruth.com/jesus-christ-in-time/Astrophysicists describe this diversity nicely, when they differentiate the perception of an observer inside a black hole (us), from the perception of someone who is outside (the Hyper-Worlds). Time inside the black hole / our universe is expanding so much, that the time between two beats of a clock becomes infinite, becoming one with eternity. So, while an object inside the black hole perceives the infinity of time, for the outside observer, time flows infinitely faster. … A moment of God, one thousand human years......
|
|
|
Post by Stranger2 on Apr 15, 2020 20:22:42 GMT
well, this sounds like a pseudo-scientific mumbo-jumbo, she doesn't know what she is talking about. Physicists still do not know what happens with space, time and matter inside the black holes. There are many hypotheses but none of them is yet proven. Where Do Black Holes Lead?
|
|
|
Post by Hans Schokkenbroek on Apr 15, 2020 20:29:28 GMT
well, this sounds like a pseudo-scientific mumbo-jumbo, she doesn't know what she is talking about. Physicists still do not know what happens with space, time and matter inside the black holes. There are many hypotheses but none of them is yet proven. Where Do Black Holes Lead?What sounds like pseudo-scientific mumbo-jumbo to you is the truth for her. You are both right as far as I am concerned. You will always find something to be right or wrong over as long as you keep looking in the world of right and wrong....
|
|
|
Post by Stranger2 on Apr 15, 2020 21:10:32 GMT
well, this sounds like a pseudo-scientific mumbo-jumbo, she doesn't know what she is talking about. Physicists still do not know what happens with space, time and matter inside the black holes. There are many hypotheses but none of them is yet proven. Where Do Black Holes Lead?What sounds like pseudo-scientific mumbo-jumbo to is the truth for her. You are both right as far as I am concerned. You will always find something to be right or wrong over as long as you keep looking in the world of right and wrong.... If she speaks about Christ, that's religion beyond physics and she can say anything that feels right or feels to be truth to her, no problem with that. But when she speaks about physics (time inside black holes), then this is now about science and there is no room for religion anymore, so she cannot present scientific statements in a religious way as spiritual truths. Well, scientologists still do it anyway, but that's a bad practice to follow. The reason they do it is that in our times the old-style spiritual or religious statements do not appeal to people anymore, so instead they use pseudo-scientific statements that sound much more convincing and appealing to the crowd. If I say something about "angels" then noone is going to listen, but if I say something about "time in black holes", adding that this is what "Astrophysicists describe", people with no background in physics are more likely to listen and believe me.
|
|
|
Post by mironlang on Apr 16, 2020 5:07:06 GMT
That is an outsider speaking in behalf of another. Good luck with that. Prove to who? basic understanding of Quantum Mechanics does not require any further proof.... Just my take anyway. Thanks
|
|
|
Post by mironlang on Apr 16, 2020 5:10:07 GMT
What sounds like pseudo-scientific mumbo-jumbo to is the truth for her. You are both right as far as I am concerned. You will always find something to be right or wrong over as long as you keep looking in the world of right and wrong.... If she speaks about Christ, that's religion beyond physics and she can say anything that feels right or feels to be truth to her, no problem with that. But when she speaks about physics (time inside black holes), then this is now about science and there is no room for religion anymore, so she cannot present scientific statements in a religious way as spiritual truths. Well, scientologists still do it anyway, but that's a bad practice to follow. The reason they do it is that in our times the old-style spiritual or religious statements do not appeal to people anymore, so instead they use pseudo-scientific statements that sound much more convincing and appealing to the crowd. If I say something about "angels" then noone is going to listen, but if I say something about "time in black holes", adding that this is what "Astrophysicists describe", people with no background in physics are more likely to listen and believe me. This is all FALSE as far as i am concerned. but who am i anyway? Just a weird fella. LOL Just my take Stranger2 Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by Boyd on Oct 22, 2020 20:56:37 GMT
Awesome material. Appreciate it. Best Essay writing literature and culture in 20th century england bloomsbury
|
|
|
Post by mironlang on Oct 25, 2020 7:33:10 GMT
|
|
|
Post by mironlang on Oct 25, 2020 7:33:45 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Alexandria on Dec 3, 2020 2:48:33 GMT
Truly a lot of valuable information. Best Essay writing help essay
|
|