|
Post by ML on Jan 24, 2019 8:41:36 GMT
Decoding Rosicrucianism and Freemasonry using the Unified Fieldmileswmathis.com/rosi.pdfThis is an amazing cross reference with the work of Avalon re science. exciting time!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 25, 2019 0:55:11 GMT
The whole hippy thing started with the introduction of the Beatles. Not that the Beatles themselves knew what hippies were but it was the spark that set the fire. Although their tunes were catchy there was nothing really new about the music. Name inspired by Buddy Holly and the "Crickets" and a mix of pop and already popular R&B covers. After initial success the Beatles would have faded into pop obscurity if they had not reinvented themselves. (Or inspired to reinvent themselves?) The hair got longer the music became more abstract. John Lennon might be the father of all hippies. I was 10 when the Beatles caught fire and even then I knew it was a strange phenomena. At one time I thought the hippie movement was a revolutionary moment, and it was... but! In which direction? Like all movements it seemed pure and genuine but then the drugs and the sex was woven in like it was a natural progression. From Love in's to Manson moments. For better or worse everything changed in the 60's into the early 70's. In my view it had to be a manufactured situation. I am a bit off the original topic here but that is how my silly brain works. These movements are encouraged from the elite and always will be. If the press did not give coverage to every fad movement it would not be a movement.
|
|
|
Post by girlscout on Jan 26, 2019 6:11:43 GMT
So practical! Love it! ”But enlightenment, as a goal, has never much impressed me, either. It is like its western counterpart: happiness. In my opinion, an enlightened person does not seek enlightenment. Perhaps that is a zen koan, perhaps not, but enlightenment and happiness are both selfish and shallow goals. A wise person seeks to do something that needs to be done. He or she seeks significant action.” ... “Most people need to think more, not less. Yes, they need to think less about shopping and paying the bills and soap operas and politics and so on, but they do not need to think less in general. When they are finished with their perfect exercise on the mat, they need to stare at the ceiling and turn their thoughts on, not off. But they need to direct these thoughts to significant things. That is why they must read significant texts. These texts give them things to think about. It is sorting through these texts and thoughts that will make them wise, and that wisdom will make them powerful. It will make them capable of significant action.”
|
|
|
Post by ML on Jan 27, 2019 13:51:31 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ML on Jan 28, 2019 2:42:14 GMT
I now do think and feel that Mathis is at a level where we must put a little more attention to.
His papers and intent looks legit.
what do you guys think?
|
|
|
Post by Hans Schokkenbroek on Jan 28, 2019 7:54:44 GMT
I now do think and feel that Mathis is at a level where we must put a little more attention to. His papers and intent looks legit. what do you guys think? Thanks Miron for asking. When I found his website and started to read his articles (and I'm still reading) I thought that it was impossible for one person to accumulate so much information and knowledge including his scientific & art articles. Either he is a genius or like he said that Shakespeare was, "he" is not one person but a few. Maybe he has people under him helping him to decipher through the tons of info on line. I know he has others writing papers and he has those published on his website, yet he himself might be 3 or 4 persons. I don't know. It's just amazing! Does he come from Langley like he suggests all controlled opposition writers and agents come from? It could be. Again I don't know. I still have a feeling not everything is genuine, although the papers I have shared are mind blowing so far; was he really a hippie and now a most conservative person? I have some questions yet I'm so curious to keep reading and keep searching for clues. So far as far as I have read he has never mentioned Lucifer once. He has mentioned Satan and the devil though, also the "gods" and "aliens". I enjoyed his mention of the Beatles song: Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds, a wink to LSD being pushed in the 60's and 70's. BTW LSD could also mean Luciferian Satanist Deception. But I digress... So I'm not completely convinced he is 100% genuine. Will keep looking for the clues. Please share if you have a feeling one way or the other. Thank you all! Elisabeth seems to be able to find some real gems. I am still so grateful for becoming aware of Angeliki and this seems to be another gem, albeit on a very different level. The sheer amount of work suggests to me it is a great way to keep people busy doing external work ie it is not for all as one can easily become totally lost in the info. So the possibility of Miles being part of the system is real. I cannot really judge it at this point because i have not looked at it in detail. I will only read what HS / my Parents tell me that I should read. They will guide me. I am definitely drawn to his work and it is apparent at first glance that Miles presents knowledge that I have not been able to find elsewhere. It just occurred to me that some of the core members seem to have reached a point where they really know the real truth comes from within. Most have built a very strong (re)connection with their HS. And now it almost seems that we are, as a forum, moving to another level. A level of more and deeper knowledge seeking. Focussing on becoming even more aware of what the system really looks like. We seem to be more focussed on external things but it is all done under the guidance of the Inner Self. Like a more complex level of information. Picking gems from the clutter whilst listening to our Inner Self and always in discern mode. But of course this is just my feeling. Thank you Elisabeth for bringing Miles to my attention.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2019 23:04:03 GMT
I now do think and feel that Mathis is at a level where we must put a little more attention to. His papers and intent looks legit. what do you guys think? I read a couple of these which caught my eye as I was trolling through the long list of updates, specifically about David Bowie and The Matrix (in both cases not the whole article). In these two instances I felt that he made associations / assertions which were unverifiable. For instance he said that Leonard Cohen wrote David Bowie's lyrics (he was referring to specific lyrics I think, as he seemed not to have any real knowledge of DBs music). As someone who is very familiar with both of these artists (having followed them on and off since I was a teenager) I see absolutely no similarity between the writing styles, beyond the fact that they both touch on spiritual matters. I feel that there are 'real' artists and there are 'manufactured' artists i.e. some are 'receptors' (as expressed by Leonard Cohen in an interview he did with Stina Dabrowski), some write from personal experience (actually a combination of both), some write in a contrived way and some are performing songs that are written for them. There definitely appear to be strings attached and for whatever reason some appear to be more 'strung' than others.... and of course there are the videos, which contain a lot of symbolism and can be revealing. I might read more, but I think it is pretty clear that 'they' are playing the good and evil game. The why and the who is who is the most interesting to me. I was quite interested in what he said about the removal of artwork. This sort of correlates with a feeling I have about what is going on, so I'll probably explore a bit more.
|
|
|
Post by ML on Jan 29, 2019 0:47:15 GMT
I now do think and feel that Mathis is at a level where we must put a little more attention to. His papers and intent looks legit. what do you guys think? I read a couple of these which caught my eye as I was trolling through the long list of updates, specifically about David Bowie and The Matrix (in both cases not the whole article). In these two instances I felt that he made associations / assertions which were unverifiable. For instance he said that Leonard Cohen wrote David Bowie's lyrics (he was referring to specific lyrics I think, as he seemed not to have any real knowledge of DBs music). As someone who is very familiar with both of these artists (having followed them on and off since I was a teenager) I see absolutely no similarity between the writing styles, beyond the fact that they both touch on spiritual matters. I feel that there are 'real' artists and there are 'manufactured' artists i.e. some are 'receptors' (as expressed by Leonard Cohen in an interview he did with Stina Dabrowski), some write from personal experience (actually a combination of both), some write in a contrived way and some are performing songs that are written for them. There definitely appear to be strings attached and for whatever reason some appear to be more 'strung' than others.... and of course there are the videos, which contain a lot of symbolism and can be revealing. I might read more, but I think it is pretty clear that 'they' are playing the good and evil game. The why and the who is who is the most interesting to me. I was quite interested in what he said about the removal of artwork. This sort of correlates with a feeling I have about what is going on, so I'll probably explore a bit more. Absolutely helpful and discerning post. Thanks Barbara.
|
|
|
Post by Hans Schokkenbroek on Jan 29, 2019 8:07:03 GMT
I am beginning to understand why they are calling us Lulu's... . Amidst the clutter there is one truth that really stands out for me. Everything 'official', be it in the news or history, is indeed fabricated. It is the moment that Jim Carrey finds his sailing boat bump into the wall and he finds the door that leads into the world outside the Matrix. Everything in his world turned out to be fake..... And if something is happening somewhere that is being reported on, look somewhere else for the real action. Also the constant referrals to family bloodlines ring true to me. Fascinating but clearly a lot of discernment is required....
|
|
|
Post by ML on Jan 29, 2019 8:37:06 GMT
I am beginning to understand why they are calling us Lulu's... . Amidst the clutter there is one truth that really stands out for me. Everything 'official', be it in the news or history, is indeed fabricated. It is the moment that Jim Carrey finds his sailing boat bump into the wall and he finds the door that leads into the world outside the Matrix. Everything in his world turned out to be fake..... And if something is happening somewhere that is being reported on, look somewhere else for the real action. Also the constant referrals to family bloodlines ring true to me. Fascinating but clearly a lot of discernment is required.... with this post it triggers one of many instances in my memory. one that is 'crazy' when i was 19 ... i flipped. i went crazy...and in one of the instances i was climbing our roof . and in my mind i was thinking... up there... i'll open up the sky and see all the 'entities' observing me..angels and gods will be there. i now know that it is there where reality exists! turns out i cant break through the roof my brothers calls the doctors and gave me Torracin and other drugs....... I became normal again... lol TRUE STORY
|
|
|
Post by ML on Jan 29, 2019 8:46:17 GMT
I am beginning to understand why they are calling us Lulu's... . Why are they calling us lulu's?
|
|
|
Post by Hans Schokkenbroek on Jan 29, 2019 10:34:13 GMT
I am beginning to understand why they are calling us Lulu's... . Why are they calling us lulu's? Not sure how serious you are with this question but this is what I was trying to say; In the WPP Wes claims that the AIF always refer to us Lulu's which apparently implies that we are incredibly stupid, very gullible, easy to fool. Reading some of Miles' stuff only reinforces that concept. How easy it is to fool the general public (including myself ). On a different topic but related to this thread; Having read several papers by Miles and having looked at this website I do get the strong feeling that he is controlled. Imagine finding his website without Inner Guidance, without the ability to discern. Since he totally seems to ignore the spiritual (as far as I can tell by reading just a tiny fraction of his work) it is very easy for a Miles' fan to become totally engrossed in reading his stuff which by the looks of it takes half a life time anyway... Nevertheless great find Elisabeth because it does bring in a few new angles that I had not yet imagined possible. Although... everything is possible in a virtual reality...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2019 12:53:36 GMT
"Not sure how serious you are with this question but this is what I was trying to say; In the WPP Wes claims that the AIF always refer to us Lulu's which apparently implies that we are incredibly stupid, very gullible, easy to fool. Reading some of Miles' stuff only reinforces that concept. How easy it is to fool the general public (including myself ). "
When one privileged side has all the time and money in the world for anything including deceit they will have a huge advantage over those of us who slave away trying to care for our own and survive life. Yes we might look stupid in comparison. They make the laws and rules. They make the lies sound like truth.
|
|
|
Post by girlscout on Jan 29, 2019 13:57:55 GMT
"Not sure how serious you are with this question but this is what I was trying to say; In the WPP Wes claims that the AIF always refer to us Lulu's which apparently implies that we are incredibly stupid, very gullible, easy to fool. Reading some of Miles' stuff only reinforces that concept. How easy it is to fool the general public (including myself ). " When one privileged side has all the time and money in the world for anything including deceit they will have a huge advantage over those of us who slave away trying to care for our own and survive life. Yes we might look stupid in comparison. They make the laws and rules. They make the lies sound like truth. Innocent and trusting are better character traits than deceitful intelligence. Trust is crucial, and they will never have it with their traits. Sucks to be them.
|
|
|
Post by ML on Jan 30, 2019 0:10:45 GMT
Why are they calling us lulu's? Not sure how serious you are with this question but this is what I was trying to say; In the WPP Wes claims that the AIF always refer to us Lulu's which apparently implies that we are incredibly stupid, very gullible, easy to fool. Reading some of Miles' stuff only reinforces that concept. How easy it is to fool the general public (including myself ). On a different topic but related to this thread; Having read several papers by Miles and having looked at this website I do get the strong feeling that he is controlled. Imagine finding his website without Inner Guidance, without the ability to discern. Since he totally seems to ignore the spiritual (as far as I can tell by reading just a tiny fraction of his work) it is very easy for a Miles' fan to become totally engrossed in reading his stuff which by the looks of it takes half a life time anyway... Nevertheless great find Elisabeth because it does bring in a few new angles that I had not yet imagined possible. Although... everything is possible in a virtual reality... Hi Hans, I am serious, I have not paid attention on the term lulu up to that point. Anton Parks and Wes referred to the divine being ( us ) as Namlú'u Namlú'u: The primordial human species. The Guardian of Earth and the Living Library. They were created by many different Founders and had the Fire of the KHAA. They were androgynous and lived during Earth's Golden Age. wespenre.com/2/definitions.htmI noticed that Namlú'u is very similar to lulu if we replace the ' with the letter L we'll end up with NamlúLu now a quick google reveals that Webster defines Nam as namDefinition of nam variant spelling of naam now naam means naam noun \ ˈnäm\ variants: or nam plural -s Definition of naam 1 early English law : distraint of chattels 2 early English law : things distrained History and Etymology for naam Middle English, from Old English nām, from Old Norse, action of taking or seizing (attested only in compounds such as landnām act of taking possession of land), learning; akin to Old English nǣm action of taking, Old High German nāma robbery; derivative from the stem of Old Norse nema to take www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/naamit basically means action of taking or seizing so Namlú'u means Taking possesion of the lulu... oohhh basically....
|
|
|
Post by IW on Jan 30, 2019 10:42:38 GMT
I read everything here. I agree with you guys, after having read 4-5 of his articles, which felt like books-- His site is like the biggest rabbit hole I've ever seen. You could spend the rest of your days researching and figuring things out, but then what??? It doesn't go farther than that, and that's a problem! This leads me to- problem reaction?? solution? Interesting thread, thanks y'all.
|
|
|
Post by ML on Jan 31, 2019 0:11:40 GMT
I read everything here. I agree with you guys, after having read 4-5 of his articles, which felt like books-- His site is like the biggest rabbit hole I've ever seen. You could spend the rest of your days researching and figuring things out, but then what??? It doesn't go farther than that, and that's a problem! This leads me to- problem reaction?? solution? Interesting thread, thanks y'all. His work can be compared to Wes. Huge amount of writings. lots of papers.
|
|
|
Post by Hans Schokkenbroek on Mar 19, 2019 14:16:17 GMT
Here is Part II: From Allan C. Weisbecker: blog.banditobooks.com/an-open-letter-to-miles-mathis-part-two/In short I found that his expose was well done and well researched as Allan did e-mail Miles M. and a group of truthers who had been quoting Miles M. and presenting him as genuine. The sheer volume of Miles' work as Irishwome mentioned was a bit of a questioning thought and Allan did the computing of the total work coming to the conclusion that not one person could have done in one year for example all of the research involved, the writing and all the science papers as well as being an artist and carrying on a normal life or so it seemed. Again this shows that our discernment is always needed and not to take anyone at face value including our beloved writers and researchers. Always truth mixed with lies! Thank you for your forgiveness and understanding! Nothing to forgive Elisabeth. We all are at different points of awareness and what sometimes may be easy for me to discern can be hard for you and vice versa, simply because we are different and we all tend to see the world as we are and not how it is... I was intrigued by your first posts about Miles but quickly felt..... nothing... and decided it was not for me. That was my truth. But the fact that you put up Miles' work has helped yourself and others (including me) and will help others in the future no doubt to hone the individual discernment skills. Nothing happens without reason. I chose to think that everything is a learning experience on the path of self knowledge. From my perspective your HS has let you experience something that is very hard to discern and it has now helped and / or nudged you a little further on path of strengthening the link with your inner guidance. But then, that is just my perspective on it and we could all be very wrong! If there is anything I have learned over the past years it is..... always listen to your self and monitor if you are balanced. Thanks for starting this thread Elisabeth.
|
|
|
Post by ML on Mar 20, 2019 3:09:31 GMT
This is quite straight to the point. LOL
Miles 'must be' a very important dude
|
|
|
Post by IW on Mar 20, 2019 4:01:08 GMT
It sounds like he is baiting folks to read BOTH Q-Anon and his papers. Probably doesn't matter which...distractions, distractions.
|
|
|
Post by ML on Oct 31, 2019 1:03:21 GMT
his updates are insanely un-real 7 papers/articles sunce October 24, 2019? That is daily article. A crew must be working for him. just noticed it
|
|
|
Post by ML on Oct 31, 2019 1:03:51 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ML on Oct 31, 2019 2:15:29 GMT
I like Miles Mathis a lot! hahaha 12 Rules for Life: an Antidote to Jordan Peterson by Miles Mathis 1.Don't trust anyone being heavily promoted out of the psychology departments of Harvard and McGill. The odds they are CIA/MI6/CSIS: 1 in 1. 2.Don't trust anyone whose first book in 19 years is picked up by Penguin Random House. It is extremely abnormal and suspicious for a 56-year-old academic psychologist to write a book for a popular audience and have it become a bestseller. It is hard to say why he was chosen for this,since he isn't even a good speaker. He never smiles, has no sense of humor, and constantly looks down or away—never a good sign. 3.Don't trust anyone promoted by the BBC, ABC, FoxNews, or HBO. All are Intel fronts. Don't trust anyone promoted by USA Today, the Wall Street Journal, TIME, Newsweek, the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the Washington Post or any other major outlets. 4.Don't trust a self-help lecturer who apparently comes out of nowhere in a matter of months and is able to immediately book and allegedly sell out the Orpheum, Beacon, Apollo and Emmanueltheaters. Those theaters are each and all huge red flags, pointing to Jewish and Intel backing. 5.Don't trust anyone who writes a self-help book. 6.Never read a book with the title 12 Rules for Life. Never read a book with the subtitle an antidote to Chaos. That is a marker it is creating Chaos and is part of the CIA's Operation Chaos. 7.Never read a bestseller. Never believe the bestseller lists. They are composed by the CIA. They just make up the numbers. They also pack the auditoriums and fake the Youtube numbers, so don't believe that either. .......... mileswmathis.com/jorda.pdf.. and he says what he wants to say...
|
|
|
Post by Hans Schokkenbroek on Nov 1, 2019 12:37:33 GMT
his updates are insanely un-real 7 papers/articles sunce October 24, 2019? That is daily article. A crew must be working for him. just noticed it This is why I do not trust his work. After a brief period of reading his articles I stopped being attracted to him. It is almost a university study in itself to read all this stuff. So just keeping up with his work is a distraction in itself. Of course that is just my personal view. He does have some real interesting reading to offer be it true or not.
|
|
|
Post by Henrik on Nov 19, 2019 12:28:39 GMT
I read most of his stuff now, and have started his science articles. He does have an ego, but at least he is not pretending not to. Seems he has a lot of spare time on his hands and having done this for many years, I don't find it odd that he could write this many articles. But as suggested above, don't trust anyone.
I did however find it very helpful to discern the level of fakery being orchestrated on us and help me immediately smell this when I see a newspaper or turn on the telly. His main view is that most of history is faked, by "normal" people, by relatively non-magical means and for relatively "human" goals, and that was a breath of fresh air. It doesn't rule out anything else, but helped me balance my views and look for concrete and practical explanations and workings. The same it is with is science articles, which should be absolutely crushing for all of modern science should there prove to be validity in it, I'm just starting on them and want to do some calculations to verify, but need to brush up on my physics first.
Note: I did find that sometimes different sites would publish stuff spinning them the way he says they do to muddy the waters and try and tarnish him, which is disconcerting: 1. either I'm just seeing things (most probably) 2. he is right and they have low levels targeting him 3. he is right because he is working with them
Post-script: I suggest we read some of his to get a feel for how to "dissect" news and history this way, then we forget about him and apply these tools ourselves to put them to the test to verify and use or discard as needed.
|
|
|
Post by ML on Nov 19, 2019 14:13:22 GMT
I read most of his stuff now, and have started his science articles. He does have an ego, but at least he is not pretending not to. Seems he has a lot of spare time on his hands and having done this for many years, I don't find it odd that he could write this many articles. But as suggested above, don't trust anyone. I did however find it very helpful to discern the level of fakery being orchestrated on us and help me immediately smell this when I see a newspaper or turn on the telly. His main view is that most of history is faked, by "normal" people, by relatively non-magical means and for relatively "human" goals, and that was a breath of fresh air. It doesn't rule out anything else, but helped me balance my views and look for concrete and practical explanations and workings. The same it is with is science articles, which should be absolutely crushing for all of modern science should there prove to be validity in it, I'm just starting on them and want to do some calculations to verify, but need to brush up on my physics first. Note: I did find that sometimes different sites would publish stuff spinning them the way he says they do to muddy the waters and try and tarnish him, which is disconcerting: 1. either I'm just seeing things (most probably) 2. he is right and they have low levels targeting him 3. he is right because he is working with them Post-script: I suggest we read some of his to get a feel for how to "dissect" news and history this way, then we forget about him and apply these tools ourselves to put them to the test to verify and use or discard as needed. I have read most of his recent stuffs. The one you posted on JFK was an earlier work i think. Yeah i like him. THe thought of dedicating a board for him like Wes and JVP have crossed our minds. what do you think Henrik?
|
|
|
Post by ML on Nov 21, 2019 1:03:11 GMT
Is it this one Hans? The hidden king(s) First draft written December 2007 First appeared on the internet 2008-9† As you see, this paper was written several years ago. I have been sitting on it for over seven years. But now, after publishing many other papers in the same line—on faked events—this one may be somewhat easier to promote. If the thesis is too far-out for you at a first glance, read the other papers first. I especially recommend my paper on the Lincoln assassination, which has many parallels to this one. I also recommend my very long paper on the Tate/Manson event. The photographic evidence I compiled for that one exceeds even the photographic evidence here—which is extensive. As usual, I offer this paper as an opinion piece, protected as free speech by the Constitution. It is my professional reading of the evidence, to be taken as such. When I say professional, I mean I have shown previous expertise in reading and de-spinning photographic evidence. As a professional realist artist, I have honed my eye over several decades......... mileswmathis.com/barindex2.pdf
|
|
|
Post by ML on Nov 21, 2019 1:09:46 GMT
Miles makes us stretch our thinking a lot more.
Its like forcing yourself to several variations more when playing chess. Are you 5 move ahead? how about if the opponent is 7 moves ahead of you?
-
This is extremely helpful in avoiding traps.
but .. i just like to say
we can only do so much. we will do our best of course.. but we must trust our connection to our spirit... Technically we must trust our real selves....
The FMC as JVP calls it. Faith and be strong in our moral values.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 21, 2019 4:34:33 GMT
About the Kennedy thing? I want to tell a true tale. Now of course I am not a Kennedy expert but I did grow up close to Kennedy turf being from Massachusetts. When Karin and I got together (25 years ago today We lived in Pocasset Ma. USA about 5 miles over the Bourne Bridge on Cape Cod. I could literally walk to the main (North) entrance to what was once Otis Air Force base. Now across the street from me was the Barnstable County Hospital. This facility was located down a long wooded drive identified by a smallish sign. It was a mental health facility so despite living close to it for near 10 years I never saw the buildings. ( a good thing lol) So where is this leading? Well the Barnstable County Coroners office was located in the nearby hospital. So we have a multiuse military complex not far away and the Coroners office almost across the street. Patrol fighter jets were flown out of this base to New York City after 911. OMG the once polite flights felt like they were going to shatter windows. Now when Jon Jon (JFK Jr.) supposedly crashed his plane coming into Martha's Vineyard sound the two facilities I mentioned above would come into play. When the wreckage was located the bodies were flown into to Otis then driven to the hospital across the street from my house. It was not a rural area but a bit country and nothing ever happened here. Until this. Every major news network was camped out across the street, Fox, ABC, NBC, CBS you name it. Of course on the evening when the JFK jr, his wife and sis in law were recovered they were to come to the Coroners office. Yes I was wandering among all the high level press and then 3 Chevy S10 pickup trucks arrived. All had windowless caps on the back. The press was convinced these were the recovered bodies. It was a bit moving really because of the Kennedy family fame. After the arrival at maybe 9pm? well the excitement was over. I went into the house and turned on the news. The news reported the bodies were in Boston 90 minutes away and had been Autopsied! Wait! National press is across the street and you are telling me the bodies have been in Boston for a while! This is not adding up. I am one of the few folks on earth that can give you this perspective as I was there. What does this mean? Well you can believe nothing. Were there actually bodies? Who knows. Maybe not. There have been far too many deaths surrounding the Kennedys to believe anything really. I had a email disscussion with Miles on this. Well not much of a discussion as his reply was simply "there were no bodies".
|
|
|
Post by ML on Dec 20, 2019 8:26:59 GMT
|
|